Anderson Vs. Warden
This text of Anderson Vs. Warden (Anderson Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ARNOLD KEITH ANDERSON, No. 83205 Petitioner, vs. WILLIAM A. GITTERE, WARDEN, Respondent. SEP 0 9 2021 EL1ZADEF Br--:OWN CLEXSÇF SIJÇIREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERX
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition appears to seek a writ directing the district court to act on the prove-up motion that he filed with regard to his civil complaint, in which petitioner alleges he was held in prison five years and nine months past his correct release date. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(C)) I 947A 21-'2_61-21 Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned 1 cardies] the burden of denaonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
C.J. Hardesty
J. Parraguirre Stiglich
cc: Arnold Keith Anderson Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County Clerk
(0) I947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-vs-warden-nev-2021.