Anderson Vs. Warden

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ARNOLD KEITH ANDERSON, No. 83205 Petitioner, vs. WILLIAM A. GITTERE, WARDEN, Respondent. SEP 0 9 2021 EL1ZADEF Br--:OWN CLEXSÇF SIJÇIREME COURT BY

DEPUTY CLERX

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition appears to seek a writ directing the district court to act on the prove-up motion that he filed with regard to his civil complaint, in which petitioner alleges he was held in prison five years and nine months past his correct release date.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

SUPREME COURT OF

NEVADA

(C)) I 947A 21-'2_61-21

Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned 1 cardies] the burden of denaonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

Hardesty

J.

Parraguirre Stiglich

cc: Arnold Keith Anderson Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A