Anderson Vs. Deal
This text of Anderson Vs. Deal (Anderson Vs. Deal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ARNOLD KEITH ANDERSON, No. 83398 Appellant, vs. D. DEAL; W. GITTERE; A. ALLRED; FILED AND J. BORROWMAN, AUG 2 7 2021 Res ondents. EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK QF $1PREIÆ COURT BY DEPUTY° ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for a default judgment. Seventh Judicial District Court, White Pine County; Steve L. Dobrescu, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule." Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule allows an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for a default judgment. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
•
J. Cadish
A ,J Pickering Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
ith (447A cc: Hon. Steve L. Dobrescu, District Judge Arnold Keith Anderson Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County Clerk
19.47A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson Vs. Deal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-vs-deal-nev-2021.