Anderson v. Yellowtails, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anderson v. Yellowtails, Inc.

866 So. 2d 79, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18343, 2003 WL 22849440

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 3, 2003

DocketNo. 3D02-1464

StatusPublished

This text of 866 So. 2d 79 (Anderson v. Yellowtails, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Yellowtails, Inc., 866 So. 2d 79, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18343, 2003 WL 22849440 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Norman and Leslie Anderson (“plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s order granting final judgment in favor of Yellowtails, Inc., d/b/a/ Mambo Café in a personal injury action. The plaintiffs allege the trial court erred in granting a partial directed verdict in favor of Mambo Café on Norman Anderson’s claim that there was prior damage to the chair from which Anderson fell. We agree and reverse.

An appellate court when reviewing the grant of a directed verdict must view the evidence and all inferences of fact in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, and can affirm only where no proper view of the evidence could sustain a verdict in favor of the nonmoving party. See Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 802 So.2d 315 (Fla.2001); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzie, 502 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Here, when viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the jury could have determined that the chair was damaged prior to plaintiffs injuries. Accordingly, the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict on this issue. The final judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Norman and Leslie Anderson (“plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s order granting final judgment in favor of Yellowtails, Inc., d/b/a/ Mambo Café in a personal injury action. The plaintiffs allege the trial court erred in granting a partial directed verdict in favor of Mambo Café on Norman Anderson’s claim that there was prior damage to the chair from which Anderson fell. We agree and reverse.

An appellate court when reviewing the grant of a directed verdict must view the evidence and all inferences of fact in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, and can affirm only where no proper view of the evidence could sustain a verdict in favor of the nonmoving party. See Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 802 So.2d 315 (Fla.2001); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzie, 502 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Here, when viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the jury could have determined that the chair was damaged prior to plaintiffs injuries. Accordingly, the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict on this issue. The final judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

866 So. 2d 79, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18343, 2003 WL 22849440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-yellowtails-inc-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack