Anderson v. XYZ Correctional Health Services, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. XYZ Correctional Health Services, Inc.

169 F. App'x 155

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2006·No. No. 05-7523·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Elmer Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as untimely under the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. XYZ Corr. Health Serv., Inc., No. CA-02-1045-1-GBL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We deny Anderson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Elmer Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as untimely under the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. XYZ Corr. Health Serv., Inc., No. CA-02-1045-1-GBL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We deny Anderson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Anderson v. XYZ Correctional Health Services, Inc., 169 F. App'x 155 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

169 F. App'x 155 (Anderson v. XYZ Correctional Health Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related