Anderson v. XCEL ENERGY
This text of 744 N.W.2d 236 (Anderson v. XCEL ENERGY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 15, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d *237 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
744 N.W.2d 236, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 41, 2008 WL 324826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-xcel-energy-minn-2008.