Anderson v. Wynne

62 Ala. 329
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ala. 329 (Anderson v. Wynne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Wynne, 62 Ala. 329 (Ala. 1878).

Opinion

BRICKELL, C. J.

There are numerous decisions of this court, from which we have no inclination to depart, that an executor, or administrator, or guardian, or trustee (not a mere agent or attorney), who, in good faith and in the exercise of reasonable diligence, during the war, in the regular administration of the trust, received, in satisfaction of debts due to him in his representative capacity, Confederate treasury notes, while they were the circulating medium, and generally received in payment of debts and in the transaction of business, is not chargeable, because the results of the war rendered them valueless. — Ferguson v. Lowry, 54 Ala. 510 ; Waring v. Lewis, 53 Ala. 615; Key v. Jones, 52 Ala. 238; Foscue v. Lyon, 55 Ala. 441. The discussion of the question cannot be reopened. The decree of the Chancellor is in direct conflict with this doctrine, with the decisions to which reference is made, and other decisions of this court in manuscript. The result is, the decree must be reversed, and a decree here rendered dismissing the bill at the costs of the appellees in this court, and in the court of chancery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Key v. Jones
52 Ala. 238 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Waring v. Lewis
53 Ala. 615 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Ferguson v. Lowery
54 Ala. 510 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ala. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-wynne-ala-1878.