Anderson v. Waste Management of Wilmington
This text of 669 F. App'x 678 (Anderson v. Waste Management of Wilmington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Edward W. Anderson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Waste Mgmt. of Wilmington, No. 7:15-cv-00014-FL, 2016 WL 1183114 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the [679]*679facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-waste-management-of-wilmington-ca4-2016.