Anderson v. Waste Management of Wilmington

Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Waste Management of Wilmington

669 F. App'x 678

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2016·No. No. 16-1480·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward W. Anderson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Waste Mgmt. of Wilmington, No. 7:15-cv-00014-FL, 2016 WL 1183114 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the [679] facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward W. Anderson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Waste Mgmt. of Wilmington, No. 7:15-cv-00014-FL, 2016 WL 1183114 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the [679] facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Anderson v. Waste Management of Wilmington, 669 F. App'x 678 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 678 (Anderson v. Waste Management of Wilmington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related