Anderson v. Washington

E.D. Michigan

Anderson v. Washington

DecidedApril 30, 2021

Docket2:21-cv-10236

StatusUnknown

This text of Anderson v. Washington (Anderson v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Washington, (E.D. Mich. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

RONALD ANDERSON, et al., 2:21-cv-10236

Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING MOTION v. (ECF NO. 9) HEIDI WASHINGTON, et al., Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff George Hudgens= motion to be dismissed, i.e., to withdraw, from this prisoner civil rights action. Plaintiff Hudgens dated his motion on April 5, 2021. The case, however, was transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan on February 26, 2021 (ECF No. 7) and opened there on March 1, 2021. Consequently, this Court no longer has jurisdiction over the matter and does not have the authority to rule on the motion. See Miller v. Toyota Motor Corp., 554 F.3d 653, 654 (6th Cir. 2009); see also Jackson v. Sloan, 800 F.3d 260, 261 (6th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the Court dismisses the motion for lack of jurisdiction. This dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a motion in the Western District. No further pleadings should be filed with this Court. This case is closed. 1 SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2021 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

RONALD ANDERSON, et al., 2:21-cv-10236

Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING MOTION v. (ECF NO. 9) HEIDI WASHINGTON, et al., Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff George Hudgens= motion to be dismissed, i.e., to withdraw, from this prisoner civil rights action. Plaintiff Hudgens dated his motion on April 5, 2021. The case, however, was transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan on February 26, 2021 (ECF No. 7) and opened there on March 1, 2021. Consequently, this Court no longer has jurisdiction over the matter and does not have the authority to rule on the motion. See Miller v. Toyota Motor Corp., 554 F.3d 653, 654 (6th Cir. 2009); see also Jackson v. Sloan, 800 F.3d 260, 261 (6th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the Court dismisses the motion for lack of jurisdiction. This dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a motion in the Western District. No further pleadings should be filed with this Court. This case is closed. 1 SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2021 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Anderson v. Washington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-washington-mied-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack