Anderson v. Warnock

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Anderson v. Warnock

5 S.C.L. 2

DecidedDecember 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 5 S.C.L. 2 (Anderson v. Warnock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Warnock, 5 S.C.L. 2 (S.C. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia.

The bond not being assignable under the A. A. 1798, so as to enable the assignee to bring an action in his own name, as assignee, subject to all the equity, &c., is no sufficient objection to its being a subject of discount, as the note was the consideration of the assignment of the bond. The contract was one relating to the assignment, and the promissory note, and between the same ■parties.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

The bond not being assignable under the A. A. 1798, so as to enable the assignee to bring an action in his own name, as assignee, subject to all the equity, &c., is no sufficient objection to its being a subject of discount, as the note was the consideration of the assignment of the bond. The contract was one relating to the assignment, and the promissory note, and between the same ■parties.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 S.C.L. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-warnock-sc-1811.