Anderson v. Warnock

5 S.C.L. 2
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

Curia.

The bond not being assignable under the A. A. 1798, so as to enable the assignee to bring an action in his own name, as assignee, subject to all the equity, &c., is no sufficient objection to its being a subject of discount, as the note was the consideration of the assignment of the bond. The contract was one relating to the assignment, and the promissory note, and between the same ■parties.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Warnock, 5 S.C.L. 2 (S.C. 1811).

5 S.C.L. 2 (Anderson v. Warnock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.