Anderson v. Warden
488 P.2d 149, 87 Nev. 418, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 440
Opinion
OPINION
Having given full consideration to the briefs and the record on appeal, we find that there is substantial competent evidence [419]*419in the record to support the order below and that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error.
The order denying appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Warden, 488 P.2d 149, 87 Nev. 418, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 440 (Neb. 1971).
488 P.2d 149 (Anderson v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.