Anderson v. Warden

Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Warden

106 F. App'x 865

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2004·No. No. 04-6915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tyrell Davron Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Warden, No. CA-03-3342AMD (D.Md. May 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tyrell Davron Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Warden, No. CA-03-3342AMD (D.Md. May 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Anderson v. Warden, 106 F. App'x 865 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

106 F. App'x 865 (Anderson v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related