Anderson v. Warden
This text of Anderson v. Warden (Anderson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6915
TYRELL DAVRON ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN; FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Commissioner of Corrections; CASE MANAGEMENT OF ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; RODERICK R. SOWERS, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-3342-AMD)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrell Davron Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Francis Curran, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Tyrell Davron Anderson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Anderson v. Warden, No. CA-03-3342-AMD (D. Md. May 3, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-warden-ca4-2004.