Anderson v. Wainwright

158 So. 2d 518
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1963
DocketNo. 33064
StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 2d 518 (Anderson v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Wainwright, 158 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An original petition for writ of habeas corpus is presented by this petitioner on numerous grounds. Insofar as petitioner contests the constitutionality vel non of the procedures allegedly employed in the execution of the indeterminate sentence imposed against him, the petition should be denied. F.S. Section 921.18-921.23, F.S.A.; Carnley v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 118 So.2d 629. To the extent, however, that the petition is predicated upon issues cognizable by motion under Rule 1, Florida Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, we do not reach its merits because the remedies provided by the Rule are not shown to have been exhausted.

Writ denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, TJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carnley v. Cochran
118 So. 2d 629 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 2d 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-wainwright-fla-1963.