Anderson v. US Bank National Association

339 S.W.3d 519, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 330
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 95511·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Anderson appeals from the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of U.S. Bank National Association (Defendant). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the circuit court did not err in granting Defendant’s motion because there is no genuine issue of material fact and Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. US Bank National Association, 339 S.W.3d 519, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 330 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

339 S.W.3d 519 (Anderson v. US Bank National Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.
854 S.W.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)