Anderson v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency

395 U.S. 823, 89 S. Ct. 2133, 23 L. Ed. 2d 738, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1170
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 23, 1969·No. No. 1414·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency, 395 U.S. 823, 89 S. Ct. 2133, 23 L. Ed. 2d 738, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1170 (1969).

395 U.S. 823 (Anderson v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mellow v. Pizzingrilli
800 A.2d 350 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Lincoln Party ex rel. Robinson v. General Assembly
682 A.2d 1326 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Priest v. Polk
912 S.W.2d 902 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
Goodheart v. Casey
565 A.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Willco Kuwait (Trading) S.A.K. v. deSavary
843 F.2d 618 (First Circuit, 1988)
Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.
507 A.2d 323 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
In Re Jones
476 A.2d 1287 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Driskell v. Edwards
413 F. Supp. 974 (W.D. Louisiana, 1976)
Livingston v. Ogilvie
250 N.E.2d 138 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1969)