Anderson v. UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, ST. LOUIS

336 S.W.3d 159, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 219, 2011 WL 601641
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2011·No. ED 94984·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Tiffany Anderson, appeals from the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security finding claimant ineligible for unemployment benefits. The Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, ST. LOUIS, 336 S.W.3d 159, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 219, 2011 WL 601641 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

336 S.W.3d 159 (Anderson v. UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, ST. LOUIS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berry v. State
336 S.W.3d 159 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)