Anderson v. United States Secretary of the Navy, Washington
Opinion
Warren B. Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his civil action stemming from a previous military court conviction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. United States Sec’y of the Navy, No. CA-01-224-7-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
53 F. App'x 252 (Anderson v. United States Secretary of the Navy, Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.