Anderson v. United States

Opinion

Case No.: 2:18-cv-02173-JAD-EJY 41! Kareen Anderson, we Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio and Denying Motion v. United States of America, et al., [ECF Nos. 76, 84] Defendants In this civil-rights case, Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah has considered Plaintiff Kareen Anderson’s motion to order access to court and legal mail,! which she more properly characterizes as a request for prospective injunctive relief, and recommends that I deny it.? The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was September 22, 2020, and no party filed anything. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 84] is ADOPTED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Anderson’s motion to order access to court and legal mail [ECF No. 76] is DENIED. (CY 4 ee U.S. District Judge Jennifer A./Dorsey Dated: September 26, 2020 ' ECF No. 76. CF No. 76 2 ECF No. 84. 3 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 47 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).