Anderson v. United States

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 2:18-cv-02173-JAD-EJY 41! Kareen Anderson, 5 we Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 and Denying Motion v. 7 United States of America, et al., 8 [ECF Nos. 76, 84] 9 Defendants 10 11 In this civil-rights case, Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah has considered Plaintiff 12 || Kareen Anderson’s motion to order access to court and legal mail,! which she more properly 13 || characterizes as a request for prospective injunctive relief, and recommends that I deny it.? The 14 || deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was September 22, 2020, and no party 15 || filed anything. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 16 || unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 18 || Recommendation [ECF No. 84] is ADOPTED in its entirety. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Anderson’s motion to order access to court and legal 20 || mail [ECF No. 76] is DENIED. | (CY 4 21 ee U.S. District Judge Jennifer A./Dorsey 22 Dated: September 26, 2020 23 24 ' ECF No. 76. 25 CF No. 76 2 26 || ECF No. 84. 3 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 47 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 28