Anderson v. United States
This text of 16 F.3d 421 (Anderson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
16 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
John E. ANDERSON, Richard S. Baker, Willie Barnes, Lawrence
Howell Barr, Harry R. Beech, Terrance Bigley, Donald
Crabtree, Donald E. Gallagher, Robert W. Harry, Robert
Heygster, Jerry L. Hudson, Sr., Roscoe M. Hutzell, Dennis R.
Jacobs, Rolland Johnson, George William King, Jr., Lawrence
F. Luckel, Neil E. McGarry, David M. Matvay, James Irving
Purnell, Michael J. Reilly, James H. Salter, Anthony E.
Santilli, Haig Scott, John W. Smith, Joseph Lawrence
Sullivan, Percy G. Sussex, Guy E. Tavel, Herbert C.
Wheelock, Jr., Ramon I. Ayalo, Mark Bartels, Joseph A.
Bongiorno, Mark J. Gleason, Doug Leo Vincent Goodwin, Walter
Hansborough, Jr., Eugene M. Hickey, John Hines, Milt A.
Herzing, Carolyn D. Jackson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-5168.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 14, 1993.
DISMISSED.
ORDER
The parties having so agreed, it is
ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F.3d 421, 1993 WL 525883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-united-states-cafc-1993.