Anderson v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Anderson v. United States

145 F. App'x 682

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 2005

DocketNo. 04-5308

StatusPublished

This text of 145 F. App'x 682 (Anderson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. United States, 145 F. App'x 682 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion for an injunction, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 22, 2004, dismissing this case without prejudice, and its orders filed July 29, 2004, and August 11, 2004, be affirmed. Appellant’s damages claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). The district court therefore properly dismissed the case and denied reconsideration. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for an injunction be denied.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion for an injunction, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 22, 2004, dismissing this case without prejudice, and its orders filed July 29, 2004, and August 11, 2004, be affirmed. Appellant’s damages claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). The district court therefore properly dismissed the case and denied reconsideration. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for an injunction be denied.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-united-states-cadc-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack