Anderson v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Anderson v. United States

79 F.2d 345, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4110

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 1935

DocketNo. 7316

StatusPublished

This text of 79 F.2d 345 (Anderson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. United States, 79 F.2d 345, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4110 (9th Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction upon three of four counts of an indictment. Two of the counts were for a violation of the customs inspection laws, and one was for a violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). The fourth count was dismissed. It is conceded that as to the third count the conviction was erroneous. The sentence was lor eighteen months on each count, to run concurrently.

Under these circumstances, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction upon three of four counts of an indictment. Two of the counts were for a violation of the customs inspection laws, and one was for a violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). The fourth count was dismissed. It is conceded that as to the third count the conviction was erroneous. The sentence was lor eighteen months on each count, to run concurrently.

Under these circumstances, the judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 F.2d 345, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-united-states-ca9-1935.