Anderson v. United States

630 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1825
StatusPublished

This text of 630 F. App'x 188 (Anderson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. United States, 630 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raleigh Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b), Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Anderson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Anderson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-united-states-ca4-2015.