Anderson v. United States
This text of 630 F. App'x 188 (Anderson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Raleigh Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b), Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Anderson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Anderson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-united-states-ca4-2015.