Anderson v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anderson v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

250 A.D. 775, 294 N.Y.S. 328, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8946

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 775 (Anderson v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 250 A.D. 775, 294 N.Y.S. 328, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In view of the decision in Frederici v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. (ante, p. 432), decided herewith, the motion for reargument is denied. The motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. [See 248 App. Div. 895.] The following questions are certified: 1. Was the Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company regulated and limited, after the effective date of the amendment to section 170 of the Insurance Law by chapter 290 of the Laws of 1929, to guarantees of payments of principal and interest of mortgages on improved and unencumbered real property worth at least fifty per cent more than the amount of the loan thereon? 2. Upon the concession that there is no issue of fact based on oral representations, to be tried, should the motion for summary judgment herein have been granted on the facts shown on the record? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In view of the decision in Frederici v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. (ante, p. 432), decided herewith, the motion for reargument is denied. The motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. [See 248 App. Div. 895.] The following questions are certified: 1. Was the Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company regulated and limited, after the effective date of the amendment to section 170 of the Insurance Law by chapter 290 of the Laws of 1929, to guarantees of payments of principal and interest of mortgages on improved and unencumbered real property worth at least fifty per cent more than the amount of the loan thereon? 2. Upon the concession that there is no issue of fact based on oral representations, to be tried, should the motion for summary judgment herein have been granted on the facts shown on the record? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 775, 294 N.Y.S. 328, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-title-guarantee-trust-co-nyappdiv-1937.