Anderson v. Summers
This text of 69 Ky. 423 (Anderson v. Summers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion op the court.
As the appellee Summers, as bona fide purchaser for a valuable consideration, held the legal title of Thomas D. Anderson in the sixty-four acres of land which descended from his father, Benedict Anderson, that interest was not liable to the judgment against Thomas and his co-heirs on an action brought after the alienation; the sale of it [424]*424therefore under that judgment, and especially the purchase by Summers himself, did not constitute an eviction under a paramount title, and consequently did not entitle Summers to the judgment rendered in his favor in this action for a misjudged breach of T. D. Anderson’s general Avarranty of title.
Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a dismission of the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 Ky. 423, 6 Bush 423, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-summers-kyctapp-1869.