Anderson v. Stratford Bd., Zoning App., No. Cv93 20 72 28 S (Jun. 14, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Anderson v. Stratford Bd., Zoning App., No. Cv93 20 72 28 S (Jun. 14, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6626

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided June 14, 1994·No. No. CV93 20 72 28 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM The defendant is required to grant a variance but the conditions attached to the variance, if any, are a matter within its discretion. Where an appeal is sustained the Board is required to proceed in accordance with the ruling of the Court, which means reconsideration of the application without an additional public hearing. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Zoning Commission, 30 Conn. App. 816,821; Gervasi v. Town Plan Zoning Commission, 184 Conn. 450,454.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM The defendant is required to grant a variance but the conditions attached to the variance, if any, are a matter within its discretion. Where an appeal is sustained the Board is required to proceed in accordance with the ruling of the Court, which means reconsideration of the application without an additional public hearing. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Zoning Commission, 30 Conn. App. 816,821; Gervasi v. Town Plan Zoning Commission, 184 Conn. 450,454.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE

Anderson v. Stratford Bd., Zoning App., No. Cv93 20 72 28 S (Jun. 14, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6626 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6626 (Anderson v. Stratford Bd., Zoning App., No. Cv93 20 72 28 S (Jun. 14, 1994)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related