Anderson v. Stratford Bd., Zoning App., No. Cv93 20 72 28 S (Jun. 14, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6626
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJune 14, 1994
DocketNo. CV93 20 72 28 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6626 (Anderson v. Stratford Bd., Zoning App., No. Cv93 20 72 28 S (Jun. 14, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Stratford Bd., Zoning App., No. Cv93 20 72 28 S (Jun. 14, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6626 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM The defendant is required to grant a variance but the conditions attached to the variance, if any, are a matter within its discretion. Where an appeal is sustained the Board is required to proceed in accordance with the ruling of the Court, which means reconsideration of the application without an additional public hearing. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Zoning Commission, 30 Conn. App. 816,821; Gervasi v. Town Plan Zoning Commission, 184 Conn. 450,454.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gervasi v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission
440 A.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1981)
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Zoning Commission
622 A.2d 1035 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-stratford-bd-zoning-app-no-cv93-20-72-28-s-jun-14-1994-connsuperct-1994.