Anderson v. Stolley

Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Stolley

604 F. App'x 299

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2015·No. No. 15-6276·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) civil action for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Stolley, No. 3:14-cv-00780-HEH-RCY (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) civil action for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Stolley, No. 3:14-cv-00780-HEH-RCY (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Anderson v. Stolley, 604 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

604 F. App'x 299 (Anderson v. Stolley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related