Anderson v. State
This text of 227 S.W.2d 815 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal is from a conviction for driving a motor vehicle on State Higthway No. 6 while intoxicated, with a fine of $50.00.
The only question raised by the appellant is the sufficiency of the evidence. It is not shown that the driving was on State Highway No. 6, as alleged.
Under the authority of Tate v. State, 153 Texas Crim. Rep. 415, 223 S. W. 2d 634, and many cases over a period of years, the State’s Attorney confesses error. It was not necessary to allege the number and name of the highway but since it is alleged it should be proven as alleged.
We approve the position taken by the State’s Attorney and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the same for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 S.W.2d 815, 154 Tex. Crim. 372, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.