Anderson v. State

131 S.W.2d 961, 137 Tex. Crim. 461, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 469
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Tex. Crim. 104
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 14, 1939·No. No. 20477.·Published

Opinions

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing marihuana, punishment being five years in the penitentiary.

Prosecution was under what is known as the “Uniform Narcotic Drug Act” passed by the 45th Legislature in 1937, Chapter 169, and found in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. P. C., Vol. 2, Cumulative Pocket Part as Art. 725b, Sec. 2.

No bills of exception are brought forward. The only question is the sufficiency of the evidence.

Appellant was arrested on a charge of misdemeanor theft. He was taken to the city jail in Houston. Just before being searched an officer saw him put something in his mouth which looked like a cigarette. It was discovered that this was marihuana, and two other marihuana cigarettes were found in his pockets. The material taken from appellant’s mouth and the cigarettes were analyzed by the city chemist and found to be marihuana.

The evidence supports the judgment, which is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 131 S.W.2d 961, 137 Tex. Crim. 461, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 469 (Tex. 1939).

131 S.W.2d 961 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.