Anderson v. State

267 S.W. 1114, 98 Tex. Crim. 596, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 7

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 Tex. Crim. 346 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 1925·No. No. 9011.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Upon a plea of guilty the minimum punishment was assessed. The facts are not brought forward for review. No reason for reversal has been advanced by bill of exceptions or discovered by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Upon a plea of guilty the minimum punishment was assessed. The facts are not brought forward for review. No reason for reversal has been advanced by bill of exceptions or discovered by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Anderson v. State, 267 S.W. 1114, 98 Tex. Crim. 596, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 7 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

267 S.W. 1114 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.