Anderson v. State

158 S.W. 1198, 71 Tex. Crim. 253, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 415
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 27, 1913·No. No. 2624.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for .unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor,—a felony.

The indictment in this case was found bj1' the same grand jury and under precisely the same state of facts as in the case of Woolen v. State, 150 S. W. Rep., 1165, and Mayfield v. State, 151 S. W. Rep., 303. The question was properly raised and saved in the lower court and presented in this. The question was so fully stated and discussed in said cases it is unnecessary to further state or discuss this case.

The indictment being void, the judgment is reversed and the cause ordered dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 158 S.W. 1198, 71 Tex. Crim. 253, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 415 (Tex. 1913).

158 S.W. 1198 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Land v. State
695 S.W.2d 712 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Ex Parte Holland
238 S.W. 654 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)