Anderson v. State
This text of 24 S.W. 837 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This conviction was for murder in the second degree.
The judgment fails to show that a jury was selected, empanelled, and sworn in the case. This is one of the statutory requisites of judgments in felonies in this State. Code Crim. Proc., arts. 791, 642; Willson’s Crim. Proc., sec. 2290.
We pretermit any discussion of the error assigned upon the refusal of the court to grant defendant’s request to have service of a copy of the indictment, as it will not arise upon another trial. We find no error in the remaining questions suggested for reversal.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Judges all present and concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 S.W. 837, 32 Tex. Crim. 528, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-texcrimapp-1894.