Anderson v. State of Nebraska
This text of 668 F.2d 349 (Anderson v. State of Nebraska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
668 F.2d 349
Durl F. ANDERSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA; Governor Charles Thone; Paul L. Douglas,
Attorney General; Judge Joseph Martin; Mary E. Anderson,
wife; Vincent Dowding, attorney; Thomas A. Wagoner,
attorney; John Wolf, attorney; John Doe and Jane Doe, and
any unknown others to be added as they become known, Appellees.
No. 81-2036.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 15, 1981.
Decided Dec. 18, 1981.
Durl F. Anderson, pro se.
Before HEANEY, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Durl F. Anderson, dissatisfied with the progress of his marriage dissolution proceedings in state court, attempted to remove the matter to federal court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the federal district court remanded the proceedings to state court and the appellant appeals. Various defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction. Based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court and on this court's opinion in Milligan v. Milligan, 484 F.2d 446 (8th Cir. 1973), the motion to dismiss should be, and hereby is, granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F.2d 349, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-of-nebraska-ca8-1981.