Anderson v. State of Nebraska

668 F.2d 349, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15076
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 18, 1981·No. 81-2036·Published

Opinion

668 F.2d 349

Durl F. ANDERSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA; Governor Charles Thone; Paul L. Douglas,
Attorney General; Judge Joseph Martin; Mary E. Anderson,
wife; Vincent Dowding, attorney; Thomas A. Wagoner,
attorney; John Wolf, attorney; John Doe and Jane Doe, and
any unknown others to be added as they become known, Appellees.

No. 81-2036.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 15, 1981.
Decided Dec. 18, 1981.

Durl F. Anderson, pro se.

Before HEANEY, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Durl F. Anderson, dissatisfied with the progress of his marriage dissolution proceedings in state court, attempted to remove the matter to federal court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the federal district court remanded the proceedings to state court and the appellant appeals. Various defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction. Based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court and on this court's opinion in Milligan v. Milligan, 484 F.2d 446 (8th Cir. 1973), the motion to dismiss should be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State of Nebraska, 668 F.2d 349, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15076 (8th Cir. 1981).

668 F.2d 349 (Anderson v. State of Nebraska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas Wayne Milligan v. Laurie Ann Milligan
484 F.2d 446 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)