Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Anderson v. State

554 S.W.3d 566

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 21, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105614

StatusPublished

This text of 554 S.W.3d 566 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. State, 554 S.W.3d 566 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Anderson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Anderson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 S.W.3d 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-moctapp-2018.