Anderson v. State

331 S.W.3d 349, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 160, 2011 WL 533181
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 993
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 2011·No. ED 94286·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Bradley Hall Anderson, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 331 S.W.3d 349, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 160, 2011 WL 533181 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

331 S.W.3d 349 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.