Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Anderson v. State

955 S.W.2d 218, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1813, 1997 WL 650716

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 766 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 1997·No. No. 71749·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerry Anderson (Movant) appeals order, judgment and decree denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerry Anderson (Movant) appeals order, judgment and decree denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Anderson v. State, 955 S.W.2d 218, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1813, 1997 WL 650716 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

955 S.W.2d 218 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.