Anderson v. State
798 S.W.2d 204, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1522, 1990 WL 159327
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 150 →
Opinion
ORDER OPINION
Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant’s pro se motion was timely filed. Movant’s claim of error was addressed in Clark v. State, 736 S.W.2d 483 (Mo.App.1987). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would not have precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.-16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. State, 798 S.W.2d 204, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1522, 1990 WL 159327 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
798 S.W.2d 204 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. State
736 S.W.2d 483 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)