Anderson v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Anderson v. State

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 272, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 48

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 20, 1981

DocketNo. 81-CC-0532

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 272 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. State, 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 272, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 48 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this cause indicated that the purpose of the expenditure by the Department of Corrections for which this claim was filed was for John R. Anderson, an employee of the Department of Corrections participating in the Tax Sheltered Annuity program. $145.00 per pay period is deducted from his salary and sent directly to the vendor of these annuities. The two (2) payments totalling $290.00 for the month of June, 1978, were not sent before the appropriation lapsed and the Attorney General has submitted a stipulation by Respondent based upon information forwarded to his office by said Department, as evidenced by the department report attached to the stipulation.

Accordingly, this Court finds that this was a properly authorized expenditure at prices reasonable, usual and customary in the area where received. Ño part of this expenditure has been paid and the total outstanding is $290.00. Money was appropriated under appropriation and fund number FY ’78 School District 001-43670-1120-00-00 for personal services of which appropriation $7.00, and yes, a transfer could have been requested from 001-42670-1300-000 School District commodities where there was $4,505 available unobligated on September 30,1978, lapsed and was returned to the State Treasury.

The sole reason said claim was not paid is due to the lapse of the appropriation for the period during which the debt was incurred.

It is hereby ordered that the Claimant, John R. Anderson, be and is hereby awarded, in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois hereby the sum of $330.00 (three hundred thirty dollars and 00/100’s).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in this cause indicated that the purpose of the expenditure by the Department of Corrections for which this claim was filed was for John R. Anderson, an employee of the Department of Corrections participating in the Tax Sheltered Annuity program. $145.00 per pay period is deducted from his salary and sent directly to the vendor of these annuities. The two (2) payments totalling $290.00 for the month of June, 1978, were not sent before the appropriation lapsed and the Attorney General has submitted a stipulation by Respondent based upon information forwarded to his office by said Department, as evidenced by the department report attached to the stipulation.

Accordingly, this Court finds that this was a properly authorized expenditure at prices reasonable, usual and customary in the area where received. Ño part of this expenditure has been paid and the total outstanding is $290.00. Money was appropriated under appropriation and fund number FY ’78 School District 001-43670-1120-00-00 for personal services of which appropriation $7.00, and yes, a transfer could have been requested from 001-42670-1300-000 School District commodities where there was $4,505 available unobligated on September 30,1978, lapsed and was returned to the State Treasury.

The sole reason said claim was not paid is due to the lapse of the appropriation for the period during which the debt was incurred.

It is hereby ordered that the Claimant, John R. Anderson, be and is hereby awarded, in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois hereby the sum of $330.00 (three hundred thirty dollars and 00/100’s).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 272, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-ilclaimsct-1981.