Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Anderson v. State

559 S.E.2d 85, 253 Ga. App. 338, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 254, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 62

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 16, 2002

DocketA02A0545

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 S.E.2d 85 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. State, 559 S.E.2d 85, 253 Ga. App. 338, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 254, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 62 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Phipps, Judge.

At a bench trial, Walter Anderson was convicted of possession of cocaine. He appeals, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Although the cocaine was seized during a consent search, he contends that his consent was tainted because he was being detained illegally. Finding Anderson’s detention legal, we affirm.

On August 29, 2000, City of Jonesboro Police Officer Thomas stopped a car operated by Anderson. He made the stop because the car bore a dealer’s drive-out tag without an expiration date in violation of state law. After Anderson produced documentation showing that the temporary tag had not expired, Thomas ran a check on Anderson’s license and was advised by the radio dispatcher that the license had been suspended because of three drug convictions. As a result, Thomas arrested Anderson, who thereupon gave his consent to a search of the car. After cocaine was found during the search, Thomas was informed by the radio dispatcher that information had been overlooked which showed that Anderson had been given a probationary driver’s license after his permanent license was suspended.

The determinative issue on the question of whether Anderson’s detention was legal is whether there was probable cause for his arrest. In ascertaining whether there exists probable cause for an arrest, the arresting officer may be entitled to rely on information received by radio dispatch or provided by other officers even if the information later proves incorrect.¹ “The material inquiry is whether [339]*339the facts within the officer’s knowledge at the time of the arrest constituted reasonably trustworthy information which was sufficient to authorize a prudent person to believe that [the suspect] had committed an offense. [Cit.]”² The evidence supports a finding that the radio dispatch received by Thomas, although erroneous, was “reliable enough to underlie the reasonable belief which is needed to establish probable cause for arrest.”³

Decided January 16, 2002. Sexton & Morris, Ricky W. Morris, Jr., Joseph S. Key, for appellant. Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Staci L. Guest, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Andrews, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phipps, Judge.

At a bench trial, Walter Anderson was convicted of possession of cocaine. He appeals, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Although the cocaine was seized during a consent search, he contends that his consent was tainted because he was being detained illegally. Finding Anderson’s detention legal, we affirm.

On August 29, 2000, City of Jonesboro Police Officer Thomas stopped a car operated by Anderson. He made the stop because the car bore a dealer’s drive-out tag without an expiration date in violation of state law. After Anderson produced documentation showing that the temporary tag had not expired, Thomas ran a check on Anderson’s license and was advised by the radio dispatcher that the license had been suspended because of three drug convictions. As a result, Thomas arrested Anderson, who thereupon gave his consent to a search of the car. After cocaine was found during the search, Thomas was informed by the radio dispatcher that information had been overlooked which showed that Anderson had been given a probationary driver’s license after his permanent license was suspended.

The determinative issue on the question of whether Anderson’s detention was legal is whether there was probable cause for his arrest. In ascertaining whether there exists probable cause for an arrest, the arresting officer may be entitled to rely on information received by radio dispatch or provided by other officers even if the information later proves incorrect.¹ “The material inquiry is whether [339]*339the facts within the officer’s knowledge at the time of the arrest constituted reasonably trustworthy information which was sufficient to authorize a prudent person to believe that [the suspect] had committed an offense. [Cit.]”² The evidence supports a finding that the radio dispatch received by Thomas, although erroneous, was “reliable enough to underlie the reasonable belief which is needed to establish probable cause for arrest.”³

Decided January 16, 2002. Sexton & Morris, Ricky W. Morris, Jr., Joseph S. Key, for appellant. Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Staci L. Guest, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Andrews, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.E.2d 85, 253 Ga. App. 338, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 254, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-gactapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack