Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Anderson v. State

21 S.E.2d 815, 68 Ga. App. 12, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 12

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1942

Docket29746.

StatusPublished

This text of 21 S.E.2d 815 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. State, 21 S.E.2d 815, 68 Ga. App. 12, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 12 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of larceny from the house. The uncontradicted evidence for the State, although largely circumstantial, authorized the finding of the jury; and the accused introduced no evidence and made no statement to the jury. The verdict having been approved by the judge, and no error of law appearing (the motion for new trial containing only the general grounds), this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of larceny from the house. The uncontradicted evidence for the State, although largely circumstantial, authorized the finding of the jury; and the accused introduced no evidence and made no statement to the jury. The verdict having been approved by the judge, and no error of law appearing (the motion for new trial containing only the general grounds), this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 S.E.2d 815, 68 Ga. App. 12, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-gactapp-1942.