Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Anderson v. State

21 S.E.2d 815, 68 Ga. App. 12, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 12

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1942·No. 29746.·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of larceny from the house. The uncontradicted evidence for the State, although largely circumstantial, authorized the finding of the jury; and the accused introduced no evidence and made no statement to the jury. The verdict having been approved by the judge, and no error of law appearing (the motion for new trial containing only the general grounds), this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of larceny from the house. The uncontradicted evidence for the State, although largely circumstantial, authorized the finding of the jury; and the accused introduced no evidence and made no statement to the jury. The verdict having been approved by the judge, and no error of law appearing (the motion for new trial containing only the general grounds), this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Anderson v. State, 21 S.E.2d 815, 68 Ga. App. 12, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 12 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

21 S.E.2d 815 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.