Anderson v. State
42 Ga. 9
Opinion
After a careful review *of the evidence contained in the record of this case, as well as the several grounds of error alleged therein to the rulings of the Court on the trial thereof, we are unable to bring our minds to the conclusion that there [35] is any sufficient error, which under the law, would authorize this Court to reverse the judgment of the Court below in refusing to grant a new trial.
Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. State, 42 Ga. 9 (Ga. 1871).
42 Ga. 9 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Griffin v. State
24 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Harris v. State
9 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Adair v. State
118 P. 416 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1911)
Berry v. State
31 S.E. 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Fogarty v. State
5 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)
Ridenhour v. State
75 Ga. 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1885)
Turner v. State
70 Ga. 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)