Anderson v. State

211 So. 3d 374, 2017 WL 946304, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D16-4656; 1D16-4657·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these appeals for disposition. Appellant seeks review of orders revoking his probation and sentencing him to prison. He argues in each case and the state properly concedes that by failing to conduct an appropriate plea colloquy before revoking appellant’s probation and sentencing him, the trial court reversibly erred and violated the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c). See Haug v. State, 151 So.3d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, we REVERSE the orders revoking probation and the judgments and sentences entered thereon, and REMAND for further proceedings.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 211 So. 3d 374, 2017 WL 946304, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3242 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

211 So. 3d 374 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haug v. State
151 So. 3d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)