Anderson v. State
164 So. 3d 747, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7711, 2015 WL 2414369
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241 →
Opinion
Appellant’s point on appeal, raised in two counts, neither count being more persuasive than the other, is that an assistant state attorney signed the information in this case as opposed to the state attorney himself and, thus, appellant was denied due process of law. This issue was resolved against appellant in State v. Miller, 313 So.2d 656 (Fla.1975). Further, the issue was not raised at or before trial making it not cognizable on collateral appeal. See Smartmays v. State, 901 So.2d 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. State, 164 So. 3d 747, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7711, 2015 WL 2414369 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
164 So. 3d 747 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smartmays v. State
901 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Miller
313 So. 2d 656 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)