Anderson v. State
16 So. 3d 1020, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12894, 2009 WL 2827993
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 So. 2d 579 →
Opinion
Danny Anderson appeals the order finding that he violated his community control. As there is competent, substantial evidence demonstrating Anderson’s community control violation, we affirm. However, we x’emand the matter for entry of an amended revocation order specifying the conditions of community control that were violated. See Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. State, 16 So. 3d 1020, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12894, 2009 WL 2827993 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
16 So. 3d 1020 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patt v. State
876 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)