Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State

779 So. 2d 370, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5169, 2000 WL 554419
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 711 So. 2d 106 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2382·Published

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Ray Neal Anderson challenges his judgment and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked. We affirm Anderson’s judgment and sentence except that we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error on Anderson’s written judgment. The judgment incorrectly reflects that Anderson pleaded nolo contendere when it should have reflected that he pleaded guilty.

Affirmed and remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 779 So. 2d 370, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5169, 2000 WL 554419 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

779 So. 2d 370 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.