Anderson v. State
744 So. 2d 475, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12058, 1999 WL 701811
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1999·No. No. 98-3316·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant, Calvin Anderson, raises two issues on appeal. His first argument is that the court erred in admitting into evidence a photographic lineup comprised of photos that were identifiable as “mug shots”. We hold the error in' admitting the photos to be harmless. See D’Anna v. State, 453 So.2d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Appellant’s second issue is directed to the mandatory minimum term of his three year sentence. We affirm based on Anderson v. State, 736 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. State, 744 So. 2d 475, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12058, 1999 WL 701811 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
744 So. 2d 475 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baynham v. State
937 So. 2d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Lock v. State
799 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)