Anderson v. State

739 So. 2d 1280, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12059, 1999 WL 701826
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 692 So. 2d 250
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1999·No. No. 98-3318·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for robbery with a deadly weapon. See Anderson v. State, 736 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). However, appellee concedes, and we agree, that this case must be remanded to the trial court to correct the judgment of conviction to reflect that appellant was convicted after a jury trial and not based on a plea of nolo contendere. See Cooper v. State, 714 So.2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Torres v. State, 717 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed; remanded to trial court.

DELL, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 739 So. 2d 1280, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12059, 1999 WL 701826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

739 So. 2d 1280 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres v. State
717 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cooper v. State
714 So. 2d 672 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Anderson v. State
736 So. 2d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)