Anderson v. State

523 So. 2d 740, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1495, 1988 WL 32909
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1988·No. No. 86-3026·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant raises four points on appeal. After reviewing the record in this case and after hearing oral argument on this case, we have found no reversible error. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). In light of the ample evidence establishing appellant’s guilt and discrediting his version of the events, we do not find “a reasonable possibility that the jury was unduly or improperly influenced” by any error which may have occurred. Jackson v. State, 522 So.2d 802 (Fla.1988).

Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for murder in the first degree in violation of section 782.04(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1985).

Affirmed.

LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 523 So. 2d 740, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1495, 1988 WL 32909 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

523 So. 2d 740 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orlando Light Bulb v. Laser Lighting and Electrical Supply, Inc.
523 So. 2d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)