Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State

444 So. 2d 1169, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11772
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 415 So. 2d 49 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1984·No. No. 83-836·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment revoking appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed by the trial court. The evidence sufficiently supports the trial court’s finding that appellant violated his probation by committing the crime of possession of burglary tools.

However, we find the evidence insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that appellant committed the crime of burglary. Therefore, we remand this case to the trial court with directions to vacate the burglary violation.

AFFIRMED but remanded with directions.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 444 So. 2d 1169, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 1169 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.