Anderson v. State

141 So. 2d 285
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1962·No. No. D-185·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus herein reflects that petitioner is in the custody of the United States of America and is now incarcerated in the Leavenworth, Kansas prison. Therefore, it appearing on the face of the petition that the petitioner is not in the custody of the State of Florida said petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting Chief Judge, and STURGIS and RAWLS, TT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 141 So. 2d 285 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

141 So. 2d 285 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheptin v. State, Probation & Parole Commission
308 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
City of Miami v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
141 So. 2d 285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)