Anderson v. State
This text of Anderson v. State (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
LESTER F. ANDERSON, § § Defendant Below, § No. 258, 2024 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 30109009DI (N) § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: November 22, 2024
Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s motion to
affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the Superior
Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its May 31,
2024 order denying the appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief.1 The
Court declines to address the appellant’s Ex Post Facto Clause argument because he
did not raise it in the Superior Court.2
1 State v. Anderson, 2024 WL 2815460 (Del. Super. Ct. May 31, 2024). 2 Supr. Ct. R. 8. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-del-2024.