Anderson v. State

487 So. 2d 1028, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 6027
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 507 So. 2d 580
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided April 8, 1986·No. 3 Div. 299·Published

Opinion

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

The record reflects, and the Attorney General admits, that the revocation of the appellant’s probation was in violation of Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975). Consequently, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 487 So. 2d 1028, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 6027 (Ala. Ct. App. 1986).

487 So. 2d 1028 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armstrong v. State
312 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)