Anderson v. State
487 So. 2d 1028, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 6027
This text of 487 So. 2d 1028 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Anderson v. State, 487 So. 2d 1028, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 6027 (Ala. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
The record reflects, and the Attorney General admits, that the revocation of the appellant’s probation was in violation of Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975). Consequently, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Armstrong v. State
312 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
487 So. 2d 1028, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 6027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-alacrimapp-1986.